![]() In Proceedings of Our National Landscape: A conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource. Numerical modeling of eastern Connecticut’s visual resources. An attempt at assessing preferences for natural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 1978, 6, 255–262.Ĭalvin, J. Landscape architects’ interpretations of people’s landscape preferences. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1975, pp. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions, and resources. Application of a landscape preference model to land management. Berkeley, Calif.: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, 1979, pp. Measuring the impact of urbanization on scenic quality: Land use change in the northeast. Syracuse, N.Y.: SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry and USDA Forest Service, 1978, pp. In Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry Conference. Forests can be managed for esthetics: A study of forest land owners in Massachusetts. ![]() Zube (Eds.), Perceiving environmental quality. Perceived quality of scenic and recreational environments. Dimensions of landscape preferences from pairwise comparisons. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. A cross-cultural study of exploratory and verbal responses to visual patterns varying in complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1975, 6, 316–330.īerlyne, D. Extension to Indian subjects of a study of exploratory and verbal responses to visual patterns. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.īerlyne, D. Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1955, 36, 225–241.īerlyne, D. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: Some empirical tests. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960.Īrthur, L. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.Īppleton, J. ![]() ![]() Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III). Monterey: Brooks/Cole, 1980.Īmerican Psychiatric Association. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īltaian, I., & Chemers, M. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Concerning the latter, it appears that aesthetic and emotional experiences are the most important benefits realized by many recreationists in the natural environment (Rossman & Ulehla, 1977 Shafer & Mietz, 1969). Further, this area of research relates to important questions in environmental planning and design, including, for instance, visual landscape assessment, the provision of vegetation and parks in cities, and issues of wilderness management and recreation. Research concerning affective and aesthetic response, therefore, may have a central role in advancing our understanding of human interactions with the natural environment and could prove pivotal in the development of comprehensive theories. 16 Izard, 1977 Zajonc, 1980), an affective state is an important indicator of the nature and significance of a person’s ongoing interaction with an environment (Lazarus, Kanner, & Folkman, 1980, p. Because virtually no meaningful thoughts, actions, or environmental encounters occur without affect (Ittelson, 1973, p. Affect is central to conscious experience and behavior in any environment, whether natural or built, crowded or unpopulated. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |